DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TOBACCO-CONTROL ACTIVITIES
VA has long been engaged in efforts to promote tobacco cessation in veterans. VA
researchers have been at the forefront of advances in tobacco-cessation treatments. Nevertheless,
veterans served by the VA health-care system continue to have higher rates of tobacco use than
their general-population counterparts, although not as high as those of military personnel. That
suggests that many veterans quit using tobacco, but with tobacco use increasing in the military, it
is likely that many new veterans accessing the VA health-care system will also be tobacco users,
especially those who have been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Like DoD, VA has many components of a comprehensive tobacco-control plan already in
place, including effective and enforceable policies, communication mechanisms, surveillance
activities in the form of performance measures, and periodic evaluation of tobacco-control
practices. VA has developed a National Smoking and Tobacco Use Cessation Program, and it
has recently strengthened its Smoke-Free Policy for VA Health Care Facilities. But in its efforts
to become entirely tobacco-free, the department has been thwarted by congressional legislation
that requires VA medical facilities to have designated smoking areas for veterans and employees.
The committee finds that such a requirement prevents VA from protecting its patients, employees, and visitors from possible exposure to secondhand smoke and prevents it from
promoting the health of its more vulnerable patients, those who smoke.
Virtually all the VA medical centers (VAMCs) have some form of tobacco-control
program, although the programs are not standardized or uniform. Each VAMC must designate a
smoking and tobacco-use cessation lead clinician to be the point of contact for all clinical and
other communications on tobacco cessation. However, the committee finds that that position is
typically not full-time, and the lead clinicians may have other responsibilities that take
precedence. The committee also finds that the availability of tobacco-cessation services in VA
community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs), other than the required access to medications and
brief counseling, is highly variable: some CBOCs have trained staff who offer group or
individual counseling, and others only refer patients to outside community services.
Use of the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Tobacco Use has
been encouraged by the VA Office of Public Health Policy and Prevention, and it has been
included in the National Smoking and Tobacco Use Cessation Program. The guideline highlights
the effectiveness of using the 5 A’s for each patient. VA has been successful in ensuring that all
patients are asked about their tobacco status, are advised to quit, and are referred to a tobaccocessation
program; these prompts are included in patients’ electronic medical records and are
performance metrics for evaluating VA health-care providers. But adherence to the guidelines
beyond the minimal effort required by the prompts in the medical records is variable.
VA appears to offer a broad array of tobacco-cessation counseling interventions to
patients, but there is little information on the effectiveness of these interventions for veterans.
The guidelines do not specify particular tobacco-cessation programs to be used, and VA uses
several standard programs, including those of the American Cancer Society and the American
Lung Association. The committee does not know whether VA tailors the programs to address
special needs of veterans.
The VA/DoD clinical-practice guideline and the PHS guideline provide
recommendations for evidence-based treatment of special populations that seek medical care at
the VA. Those populations include older patients, hospitalized patients, and patients who have
mental-health disorders. The committee believes that the guidelines provide a good treatment
framework.
The committee believes that veterans would benefit from a national VA quitline for
tobacco, possibly supplemented by a computer-based cessation campaign similar to the DoD
“Quit Tobacco. Make Everyone Proud” Web site. A national quitline has the advantage of
consistency of service regardless of where veterans are. Quitline counselors should be trained to
deal with veteran-specific issues, such as PTSD. Evidence shows that people who have mentalhealth
disorders are willing and able to engage in tobacco cessation and should be encouraged to
do so. The committee believes that VA should assess whether quitline counselors can provide
tobacco-cessation medications to veterans as in the private sector without the need for veterans to
obtain prescriptions from their health-care providers, particularly for over-the-counter
medications, such as nicotine-replacement therapy.
Performance measures that assess health-care providers are a good start for improving
care, but the effect of that care on patient outcomes might be even more important. The
committee believes that VA should evaluate the long-term effect of its tobacco-cessation
programs on abstinence rates. Such information would help to show where programs could be
improved or replaced.